What is NIL?

NIL stands for Name, Image, and Likeness, and refers to an athlete’s right to profit from their personal brand.1 As of July 1, 2021, a major shift in U.S. law and NCAA policy allowed college athletes to legally earn money through sponsorships, endorsements, social media, merchandise, and more without jeopardizing their eligibility.2,3

This has completely changed the landscape of college athletics and has sparked debates about college amateurism, NIL contracts, and whether athletes should be ‘paid to play.’4,5

The Complex NIL Landscape

Major players in the NIL landscape include student-athletes, colleges, coaches, state governments, the NCAA, and the federal government (which may still propose national NIL legislation in the coming months).6

Schools vary in their approach, with some fully supporting branding efforts of athletes and others navigating more cautiously. Even on the coaching level there is significant variation in how NIL is handled from sport to sport and team to team. Meanwhile, states have passed varying NIL laws, creating a patchwork of rules across the country with no current federal laws about the use of NIL.

The Debate Over NIL

The debate over NIL is complex.

Supporters argue it is long overdue compensation for athletes who generate billions for universities and the NCAA.

Critics worry it disrupts team dynamics, widens the gap between programs, and blurs the line between amateur and professional sports.7

Pros
  • Athletes can earn income and build personal brands
  • More fairness and autonomy for players
  • Encourages entrepreneurship
Cons
  • Creates potential imbalance between athletes and schools
  • May lead to exploitation or unequal opportunities
  • Increases pressure and distractions for student-athletes